Legislation
Legislation in Australia allows people to apply for three types of intervention that affect family members:…
Chranley & Smart 2012 FamCAFC 87
The case involved a 13 year old girl whose parents had been in litigation for 10 years. An order had been made for joint parental responsibility, with the child living with her mother and spending time with the father. However the child refused to spend time with the father saying that the father denigrated the mother (child’s wishes, reluctant to contact). A family report indicated that the father refused to listen to the child’s views, and declined to engage in counselling. A new order was made, supported by the ICL and a family report, granting sole parental responsibility to the mother and rescinding the order for the child to spend time with her father. The father appealed.
The father submitted 100 allegations that the mother had contravened orders, and wanted these matters to be heard first. The appeal court acknowledged that allegations of contraventions are usually heard before substantive matters, but supported the decision of the judge in this case to proceed promptly to substantive matters as being in the best interests of the child. The appeal was dismissed.
You may also like
Smedley & Snowden 2014 FCCA 762
Evidence was presented that the mother of a 9 year old boy had a long standing…
Garner & Hunt 2014 FamCA 1018
The case involved a child aged 13 years whose parents had separated when she was aged…
Paco & Racina and ANOR 2014 FamCAFC 195
A trial judge renewed orders that had previously granted unqualified sole parental responsibility to the mother…
SS & AH 2010 FamCAFC 13
The case involved an appeal by a mother against orders made by a trial judge. The…
Cannon & Acres 2014 FamCA 104
Parents of a child aged 12 years had engaged in dispute about access for 7 years. …
