Legislation
Legislation in Australia allows people to apply for three types of intervention that affect family members:…
The case involved three children aged 14, 12 and 8 years. The trial judge ordered that parents have shared parental responsibility and that the children live primarily with their mother and spend time with the father. The mother appealed the order and applied for sole parental responsibility on the topic of deciding about psychological therapy (delegated decision making). The father and ICL opposed this application. The father applied for an equal time arrangement.
The mother gave evidence that the oldest child had been diagnosed with Aspergers tendencies, and that his behaviour had deteriorated when the parents separated to the point where the child spoke about suicide.
The mother applied to adduce further evidence about changed circumstances since the trial judge had issued orders, arguing three main points: that the children had not settled into the new access arrangements and that their relationships with the father had deteriorated; that the father made an allegation that the mother alienated the children from him; and that a new partner was exerting a negative influence on the children.
The Appeal Court noted that shared care arrangements for children to live with each parent week-about generally work only when parents show a high level of cooperation and an ability to co-parent.
The mother’s appeal was dismissed.
Legislation in Australia allows people to apply for three types of intervention that affect family members:…
Mellick & Mellick 2014 FamCAFC 236 A trial judge granted sole parental responsibility to one parent…
There were two children of a relationship aged 14 and 11 years. The mother requested that…
A couple had two children aged 7 and 5 years who had lived with the mother. …
A child aged 11 years was emotionally distressed and the parents disputed the reasons for this…
A trial judge granted sole parental responsibility to one parent and the other parent appealed. The…