Dollard & Hanning 2014 FamCA 149
The case involved a child aged 5 years. The judge found that while it is standard…
Evidence was accepted from a family consultant although the consultant had not interviewed the children involved, and did not observe interactions between the children and parents. The consultant had conducted a mediation session with parents to help them to reach agreement.
The Court described features of the Less Adversarial Trial procedure that is used in family law disputes. With the help of a family consultant, the judge identifies topics that are in dispute. Affidavits and evidence are prepared after issues in dispute are identified. The judge determines what evidence is required to resolve contentious issues of fact, the manner of presenting evidence, and the manner of testing evidence. The judge decides the number of experts who may give evidence on a topic (experts number of). A judge may interview a child, under conditions that are decided.
The case involved a child aged 5 years. The judge found that while it is standard…
An expert who provided reportable therapy had provided a treatment report to Court although the report had not been…
The mother of a 7 year old child sought to reduce the time the child spent…
Both parties wanted to restrict the child’s relationship with the other to occasional supervised visits, either temporarily…
A mother appealed an order saying that a family report prepared by a family consultant had not…
A lawyer representing a father applied for two reports prepared by a family consultant to be…